RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy

  • So I was reading this on Steam and I'm so confused...
    This game is awesome, but the fundamental principle of this game is, indeed, piracy.

    "Toxic communication over text/voice chat that isn’t of a discriminatory nature (i.e. doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms) will – depending on the strength of the offence – earn a player from 1-3 points and a corresponding suspension of 1-3 days for each instance of this behaviour."

    None of that makes sense. How can you roleplay a pirate without taunts, sinking ships, and pillaging resources?

  • 22
    Post
    8.5k
    Visualizzazioni
  • @gamerglyph

    You can roleplay being a pirate without using racist, sexist, or ableist terms.
    "I'm roleplaying!" is not an excuse to treat other players like dirt.

  • "Toxic communication over text/voice chat that isn’t of a discriminatory nature (i.e. doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms) will – depending on the strength of the offence – earn a player from 1-3 points and a corresponding suspension of 1-3 days for each instance of this behaviour."

    This is a direct quote on steam... for the update:

    this is what I am referring to: "doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms"

    Under that quote anyone who taunts another player, mean or not - just acts like a pirate would in the real world without being sexist, homophobic, racist, misogynistic or ableist, gets a 3 point suspension.

    That is a bit silly.

  • @gamerglyph said in RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy:

    "Toxic communication over text/voice chat that isn’t of a discriminatory nature (i.e. doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms) will – depending on the strength of the offence – earn a player from 1-3 points and a corresponding suspension of 1-3 days for each instance of this behaviour."

    This is a direct quote on steam... for the update:

    this is what I am referring to: "doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms"

    Under that quote anyone who taunts another player, mean or not - just acts like a pirate would in the real world without being sexist, homophobic, racist, misogynistic or ableist, gets a 3 point suspension.

    That is a bit silly.

    Would all taunts be classified as toxic then ? I somehow doubt it.

  • @lem0n-curry I'm not so sure with the way most players classify Toxicity... a lot of younger people think anything they don't agree with is Toxic, so yes I think this can be abused depending on who is moderating the game at the time.

  • @gamerglyph said in RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy:

    "Toxic communication over text/voice chat that isn’t of a discriminatory nature (i.e. doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms) will – depending on the strength of the offence – earn a player from 1-3 points and a corresponding suspension of 1-3 days for each instance of this behaviour."

    This is a direct quote on steam... for the update:

    this is what I am referring to: "doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms"

    Under that quote anyone who taunts another player, mean or not - just acts like a pirate would in the real world without being sexist, homophobic, racist, misogynistic or ableist, gets a 3 point suspension.

    That is a bit silly.

    I mean, you can taunt without using insults.
    That's what I assume it means; If you're insulting people, you may get in trouble.

    I mean, most my voice communication is either idle chat, or congratulating someone on a good fight regardless if I won or lost.

  • @gamerglyph said in RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy:

    @lem0n-curry I'm not so sure with the way most players classify Toxicity... a lot of younger people think anything they don't agree with is Toxic, so yes I think this can be abused depending on who is moderating the game at the time.

    It doesn't matter what a player deems toxic personally, it's what is in the ToS allowed and not allowed.

    It's been a while since I read the MS/Xbox ToS regarding their rules in (game-)chat, but IIRC they supplied examples what was considered reportable and what was not. It stands to reason that the support team who handles these reports follow those (kind of rules), otherwise they could save a lot by just using a coin-flip.

    In your OP you also say

    How can you roleplay a pirate without taunts, sinking ships, and pillaging resources?

    Sinking ships and pillaging resources have nothing to do with toxic communication. Nowhere in the bit you quoted it mentions non-verbal/textual actions during game-play. Just because some players call getting sunk because of whatever reason they deem as toxic it doesn't fall under this rule of getting points on your account.

  • @guildar9194 Reference: lDicionary.com
    That same definition is in every dictionary that would be used by any education institution, so the definition really can't be debated.

    You may not be insulting people directly, but you are provoking them which causes the same response in most people: fight or flight.
    Either way its a gray area and wording on the 3 point ban needs further clarification and really should be reconsidered by the developers because things like the following will happen:

    Player A is fishing off an island
    Player B is thinking, hey easy target, lets get him!
    Player A notices Player B and flees to avoid conflict.
    Player B sends Player C to go to his ship and destroy it or they use cannons.
    Player A feels harassed because of the actions of Player B and C
    Player B starts yelling: Arg! Gonna sink yer ship matey! Nothin yer going to do will stop us!!
    Player A starts getting upset because all they want to do is fish without being disturbed so they report Player B

    Player B gets a 3 point suspension... for playing the game.

  • @gamerglyph said in RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy:

    @guildar9194 Reference: lDicionary.com
    That same definition is in every dictionary that would be used by any education institution, so the definition really can't be debated.

    You may not be insulting people directly, but you are provoking them which causes the same response in most people: fight or flight.
    Either way its a gray area and wording on the 3 point ban needs further clarification and really should be reconsidered by the developers because things like the following will happen:

    Player A is fishing off an island
    Player B is thinking, hey easy target, lets get him!
    Player A notices Player B and flees to avoid conflict.
    Player B sends Player C to go to his ship and destroy it or they use cannons.
    Player A feels harassed because of the actions of Player B and C
    Player B starts yelling: Arg! Gonna sink yer ship matey! Nothin yer going to do will stop us!!
    Player A starts getting upset because all they want to do is fish without being disturbed so they report Player B

    Player B gets a 3 point suspension... for playing the game.

    Except the reports are reviewed by a human. A human who knows the rules, even.
    So no, Player B would not get a suspension.

    Plus, reports have to be coupled with video evidence of the voice chat in question.
    When ANY mod working for Rare hears that Player B said "Arg! Gonna sink yer ship matey! Nothin yer going to do will stop us!!"; They won't suspend them.

    You're acting like the rules as you want to interpret them is the same vague way a mod working for Rare would.
    Rare mods have a very comprehensive list of what they can and cannot suspend or ban for.

  • @guildar9194 "You're acting like the rules as you want to interpret them is the same vague way a mod working for Rare would.
    Rare mods have a very comprehensive list of what they can and cannot suspend or ban for."

    Agreed.

    However I still think Player B would get banned because people are ultra sensitive these days. All it would take really is Player B to continuously follow Player A and sink them repeatedly. I mean it falls within the game rules as ok because that is what the game is really about. However it can also be thought of as harassment.

    So perhaps instead of a 3 point ban, just make it so player B has a duration to wait before sinking the same ship over again. Problem solved.

  • This is more xbox guidelines than Sea of Thieves themselves but I'd recommend looking at Xbox's Community Standards to see what is acceptable and unacceptable trash talk. https://www.xbox.com/en-GB/legal/community-standards

  • @gamerglyph said in RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy:

    @guildar9194 "You're acting like the rules as you want to interpret them is the same vague way a mod working for Rare would.
    Rare mods have a very comprehensive list of what they can and cannot suspend or ban for."

    Agreed.

    However I still think Player B would get banned because people are ultra sensitive these days. All it would take really is Player B to continuously follow Player A and sink them repeatedly. I mean it falls within the game rules as ok because that is what the game is really about. However it can also be thought of as harassment.

    Read the Code of Conduct:

    Repeated activity designed to ruin the experience of another player or crew constitutes harassment. Not only do we take these things very seriously, many law enforcement agencies recognise online abuse as an offence. If necessary, we will report incidents to the relevant authorities to take further action.


    So perhaps instead of a 3 point ban, just make it so player B has a duration to wait before sinking the same ship over again. Problem solved.

    That would be very difficult to put in the game; if Player A returns to the vicinity of Player B, I'd think Player B is in their right to sink them again; and can be abused if the coding is just a bit off its actual purpose.

    They currently haven't even bothered with not having a close-by respawn for the Siren Song for people who just have the quest on but don't actually do the quest (or are fighting other crews not doing the quest). I doubt they'll put in the effort to include something that comes clsoe to what you propose.

    You do realise you keep moving goalposts with almost every post you made in this topic: first it's about language, then it goes on about behaviour and then its repeated behaviour.

  • @gamerglyph they're talking about curse words, excluding slurs. And historically punishment only comes if you're truly ill-intended and using those words in a manner that is way over the roleplay line. As long as you don't make them mad enough to report you, you're safe.

  • "Toxic communication over text/voice chat that isn’t of a discriminatory nature (i.e. doesn’t use racist, homophobic, misogynistic or ableist terms) will – depending on the strength of the offence – earn a player from 1-3 points and a corresponding suspension of 1-3 days for each instance of this behaviour."

    What this is referring to are voice/text communication that uses mature language, or language designed to belittle another player, but that doesn't fall into the listed categories. Using curse words or, to a lesser extent, telling someone they [insert stronger term for "are terrible at the game"] would be covered by this.

    You are able to play a game without insulting other players. This isn't CoD, it's a relatively family-friendly adventure game, so it makes sense that they would reiterate what is already enforceable under Xbox's code of conduct in their own. If you are unable to accept that, maybe consider disabling your microphone, out of an abundance of caution.

  • @gamerglyph Actually it's quite easy, learn to "roleplay" without being toxic through text or voice chat. SOT is rated PEGI 12, so act accordingly.

  • @gamerglyph said in RE: April 24 Update SoT Enforcement Policy:

    @guildar9194 "You're acting like the rules as you want to interpret them is the same vague way a mod working for Rare would.
    Rare mods have a very comprehensive list of what they can and cannot suspend or ban for."

    Agreed.

    However I still think Player B would get banned because people are ultra sensitive these days. All it would take really is Player B to continuously follow Player A and sink them repeatedly. I mean it falls within the game rules as ok because that is what the game is really about. However it can also be thought of as harassment.

    So perhaps instead of a 3 point ban, just make it so player B has a duration to wait before sinking the same ship over again. Problem solved.

    It does not matter how 'ultra sensitive' people are. The rules are the rules.
    If Player A gets offended that he got sunk; Rare WILL NOT ban Player B for sinking him.

    Player A can yell all they want about how offended they are, and how they consider it toxic; Sinking is not toxic, according to the game's rules.
    Therefore, Player B, just saying 'I am going to sink you', or sinking someone, will not be banned.
    Because the mods enforce the rules as they are required too. Not based on one player's feelings about PvP.

    You're acting like a player just has to say "I'm offended" and they can get someone banned. Which is incredibly incorrect.

  • It's not just the aggressor, some get very salty when "three hours hard work" gets pirated and cuss and insult and so forth, maybe not racist etc but it will get reviewed and if deemed out of order will get some browny points

  • @gamerglyph

    Are you trying to justify using racist/homophobic wording while sinking/PvPing people?

    There's tons of ways of taunting people in a fun/creative way that doesn't involve the use of obvious, BAD words. Especially if you actually wanna RP, then there's a bunch of pirate "slang" and phrases to use.

  • Conduct gets easier to navigate when keeping two things in mind. How it could affect others and how it could affect you in the long term.

    It's not anything to fear or to fight against. It's a public and shared space. Just avoid harsh language and personal insults.

    Most of us already do this in our personal lives. With some friends we might communicate entirely differently than how we do with others. The humor can shift, the severity of the language can shift, etc. People do this all the time privately so it's just extending the same consideration to a public space.

    Being considerate of others and of the impact of our conduct is an investment that always pays off in the end, in a lot more ways than one.

    Just about everyone that is considerate of how they communicate and conduct themselves ends up wittier and more creative in the end. It will literally help people become better role players, not worse.

  • @gamerglyph

    There’s a certain point when taunting becomes toxic. If it’s playful and doesn’t use any racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. terms then it’s fine to use in conversation.

    However, if you start going down the dark path and using swears, racist comments, etc., that’s when things start to be considered toxic.

    You’re either overthinking this, or you just really don’t understand how taunts work.

  • Just need to remember.
    Do not use any voice chat in the game in the future, as Rare does not allow us to use voice chat.
    Because none of us understand how to determine if the other party is using insulting language?
    RARE didn't tell us either. Their way of judging insulting language.
    [mod edit]
    You can open a translation software, input this Chinese into it, and let the translation software tell you how to pronounce this Chinese.
    The pronunciation of this word may sound insulting to those familiar with English.
    But in the Chinese language environment, this word is a daily communication language used by people.
    [mod removed]

    Suppose there is a country called "A" in the world, and their curse words sound like "hello".
    This vocabulary is explicitly prohibited in their country.
    I met a player in the game and I just wanted to say hello to him. So I said, 'Hello'.
    Coincidentally, the person across from me is from country "A". Can he report me?

    So I suggest that we all avoid using the game's voice chat.
    Unless RARE tells everyone how they define insulting language.
    Especially cultural conflicts from different countries.

  • @gamerglyph

    Would you say it to your parents/grandparents.....a cop?

22
Post
8.5k
Visualizzazioni
11 su 22