RARE give us an official statement.

  • @capt-crunch1969 said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @hrenli said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @capt-crunch1969 said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    not dilivering what they promiced

    Could you please share your knowledge and provide a link to a factual promise made by Rare which is not implemented in the game?

    their ya go enjoy

    I like how people post angry joe like he is even relevent anymore. And nothing in here was promised by rare that we did not get. Just a angry yelling Latino who does not like the game.

  • @baronstinkbeard This guy is a very sensible player and has a good mindset imo. I have been watching his content for a while now, but not just his. I also stumbled upon Angry Joe's video. We need Angry Joe when things are really going down the wrong path (EA Casino MicroTransaction, Destiny service joke, PUBG going back on MODS, etc ...). But I do not feel we have even engaged on such a path with SoT. Anyway I'll let the videos (and Jack) speak for themselves, Enjoy!

  • @capt-crunch1969 said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    I would like to see RARE come out and post an official post on what they plan to do with the lack of content and not dilivering what they promiced and what they intent to do and a time frame ect.....

    They did...

    We hear the content question and understand why people are keen to see how we plan to move Sea of Thieves forward. Planning is ongoing on the next set of priorities right now, and we are adjusting our existing plans based on the feedback we've been seeing. We will have more to share on this soon.

    https://www.seaofthieves.com/news/launch-status-update

  • @dampiar I like custard creams.

  • @knifelife said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @cupohemlock said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @capt-crunch1969 said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    I would like to see RARE come out and post an official post on what they plan to do with the lack of content and not dilivering what they promiced and what they intent to do and a time frame ect.....

    Rare delivered exactly what they promised at launch.

    Rare never specifically said exactly what was coming at launch, they didnt give a list or anything. They used alot of marketing talk to let peoples imaginations sell the game for them. They spoke in riddles alot of the time and didnt particularly deny or let players know that they had got there expectations way to high.

    I always see you giving this argument and its just not true They never really gave any specifics on much and let there players hype up the game and insinuate there was tonnes more content then there actually was.

    While they didnt lie about content they wasnt open about it either..

    We completely disagree. There have been Dev blogs and Youtube's about what to expect. No promises were made for anything more than what we have now.

  • @lowbei said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    rare doesnt owe you any answer. you bought their game. stop whining.

    "Rare doesn't owe you anything"
    "You bought their game"

    Pick one. Only one of these can be true.

  • @arecbalrin This is da wae:
    https://www.seaofthieves.com/forum/topic/39577/vote-for-post-launch-content-poll/2?page=1

  • @ironuzuka said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @baronstinkbeard This guy is a very sensible player and has a good mindset imo. I have been watching his content for a while now, but not just his. I also stumbled upon Angry Joe's video. We need Angry Joe when things are really going down the wrong path (EA Casino MicroTransaction, Destiny service joke, PUBG going back on MODS, etc ...). But I do not feel we have even engaged on such a path with SoT. Anyway I'll let the videos (and Jack) speak for themselves, Enjoy!

    And I agree but there is still nothing in either video that was a specific promise by rare that we never got...

    It is like when people got upset about battlefront 1 not having a campgain. Dice never said we would get one...

    Nothing that rare promised that we did not get. That is what is so mind blowing. People are saying rare promised stuff and that we did not get it. What was promised?

  • @cupohemlock Ive seen them all, and you are in your right to disagree. But the truth is Rare have always been very secretive and speak mostly in riddles. They also let the community over hype there game to ridiculous amounts and didnt step in to do anything about it. Hence why they are getting such a backlash now..

  • @cupohemlock @KnifeLife Guys it's a matter of reception. You don't have the same antennas. Maybe if there are youtube videos and blogs, you could post them here ?

  • How can Rare control what people think??

    Most of the videos I got were from their Twitter page!

  • @baronstinkbeard Agreed about the official announcement thing. Jack is just a nicer and more constructed way of saying the game is good and delivers on what was promised, BUT here is what HE feels could improve the overall experience.

    Baronstinkbeard, I do think that we agree on the core issues.

  • @ironuzuka said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @baronstinkbeard Agreed about the official announcement thing. Jack is just a nicer and more constructed way of saying the game is good and delivers on what was promised, BUT here is what HE feels could improve the overall experience.

    Baronstinkbeard, I do think that we agree on the core issues.

    Oh definitly on the core of the game. 100% A+. Can it be improved, yes. And they are. They have said they are. But this whole "things promised that we did not get" BS is just that BS.

  • @ironuzuka Wait, wait, wait, did you just compare house construction to that of game development? Artistic design vs actual living conditions? Hang on a second here...

    I however won't point that out too terribly much because your statement against me or to me for that matter is true. I am biased towards white knights, want to know why? Look at For honor, look at it's state. Look at Absolver, look at it's state, two recent examples of people going "Na, it's fine!" and yet after months of subjective criticism Ubisoft pulls the plug on the idea of no dedicated servers and offers them, to what player base is left? Absolver? Well, in a similar boat, yet it isn't the problem with the servers, but the player base wanting basic balance.

    See, the problem isn't so much I hate white knights, I just hate people who don't see the bigger picture or can see the game's bigger potential with a few tweaks and fixes, that do not alter or hinder the game's original design in anyway and offer to benefit it in the long run to multiple new buyers or potential unhappy old ones.

    So, you know? Good for you if you think I am wrong? It's an opinion after all, but one I stick by and the developers who listen to their consumers, not go with their idea be it right or wrong, tend to get by a lot better in the long run. RARE is a company I trust, but I honestly don't see thing going well for them if they continue the path they've currently set for themselves. Adjustment is part of development and sometimes,you need help figuring out what is needed to adjust.

  • @baronstinkbeard AMEN!

  • @ironuzuka alt text

  • @arecbalrin

    Actually, both can be true.

    FACT: You purchased the Game. - There is no debating that you paid money for this.

    FACT: If RARE Provided you with a digital or physical copy of the game and you can log into their servers. They have fulfilled their end of the agreement/contract and no longer "owe" you anything.

    So both are true. Now we as purchasers/investors can request update information, but there is nothing to say that they also cannot just disappear into the wind. Never to be seen or heard from again.

    So before you say you can only pick one.....

  • This guy, @CoyoTe4711, uses the name of Jesus wrongly to defend Rare staff for ejoying Easter weekend.

    That would’ve been fine without using the Lords name in the manner it was used. We all pick our professions and some don’t allow for much rest. What is Easter about again besides just another holiday?

    To make matters worse, the comment gets 20 plus upvotes. Priorities need to get set straight here people. Seriously sad.

  • @cupohemlock said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    How can Rare control what people think??

    Most of the videos I got were from their Twitter page!

    They participated in previews which exaggerated and hyped the game, sometimes Rare employees joined in with that hype. They had a moral obligation to correct any inaccuracies. They should have had disclaimers in every gameplay video regarding whether what was shown represented actual gameplay or the final release, like almost every single other game does. I've not found a single SoT video featuring that common disclaimer, yet there are things shown or talked about in those preview videos which are not currently in the game and we have had no explanation for why.

    Rare has done public Q&As where they were asked specific questions about content, which they had an obligation to be honest and open about but their only responses were in the realm of 'more soon' in perpetuity and this remains the case.

    I love the game, but it has problems and they need dealing with. The game is in danger of 'doing an Evolve' if nothing changes and that is absolutely the worst thing that could happen. Those who discourage certain types of negative feedback with responses like "you got what you paid for"(caveat emptor) make that scenario MORE LIKELY. Stop it, please. You can not help Rare or SoT by getting annoyed by some of the feedback, enough so that you feel it's worthwhile to undermine people who post it.

    Rare themselves can not use 'caveat emptor' as a response to criticism about the woeful lack of things to do in the game and the repetitive gameplay loop of find, fight and fetch. If they did, no one would ever buy anything they produced again, reasonably so. It's an argument which has a lifespan of milliseconds.

  • @nightmare247365 said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @arecbalrin

    Actually, both can be true.

    FACT: You purchased the Game. - There is no debating that you paid money for this.

    FACT: If RARE Provided you with a digital or physical copy of the game and you can log into their servers. They have fulfilled their end of the agreement/contract and no longer "owe" you anything.

    So both are true. Now we as purchasers/investors can request update information, but there is nothing to say that they also cannot just disappear into the wind. Never to be seen or heard from again.

    So before you say you can only pick one.....

    Caveat emptor: the graveyard of many once-great businesses. Both can not be true because if both are true, there is no reason to ever trust anything a company ever says ever again, nothing they say can be taken at face-value, no good-will can ever be extended to them because they will exploit it. There is a reason Rare and Microsoft's PR people are not using such an argument: they may as well take cyanide.

  • @kashaarafall I won't use analogies since I may be expressing myself badly. Works for most people, so might also be just you. Anyway building a house has to both be functional and good looking. A game is the same, has to be functional and good looking.
    A house needs several types of workers, electrician, architects, builders, etc ... These guys need to coordinate to render the vision.
    Video games need severel types of workers too, graphic designers, map designers, coding people, etc ...

    Both house and video games need to get sold: marketing and corporate people.
    So my analogy works just fine. Hope you will agree after this explanation and nice try at discrediting me, fair game.

    I feel, you are clearly not making the effort to get what I mean ^^ I said things are Grey and/or Black and White. I do think we need people like you just like we need haters and unconditional fans.
    What we don't need is a minority of wannabe geniuses who think they know all about how to make and run a good game! If they did, they would be in that industry making millions! Sorry if that read a little raw.

    Overall we agree that feedback is essential, especially in 2018. People have changed, the market has changed. Marketing, everything is changing faster than we can anticipate.
    Look at the Star Wars debate and the passions it generates ... (as far as I am concerned, there is no debate, this movie and any following are dead to me).

  • @augunslingin Here is a message from this guy *****.

    If mentioning ***** offends you, maybe devs should just Censor it. No ***** no problems. Seems to be their logic for third Reich ******.

    [EDIT] See what I did there my queen and loyal subjects ? Sorry in advance xD

  • @arecbalrin You are 100% right that there has to be faith and that the buyer should beware.

    However, let's discuss this logically. We are investors of this game, by purchasing it or playing via the Microsoft by the gamepass. As investors, we have the right to know where our money has gone. Many Fortune 500 companies who are publicly traded respond to requests once every three months or so with a "Shareholders" meeting.

    With that said this game has been officially released for just about 2 weeks now depending on the region and time zone. They have provided us with a video update, tweets about the condition, maintenance upgrades, a forum/website posting about when things will be fixed. They have done more response and discussion than many Top 10 companies do in a year in 2 weeks.

    While it is not unreasonable to ask for communication, I believe the devs have been very forthcoming with us about what is going on. This communication has given me and many other's faith in the devs.

    Now many manufacturing companies (software development can be considered manufacturing a product) have a built-in time window for failure on a massive scale. Even though they test and do Quality Assurance checks, things can and will fail. The true test is how quickly they can respond to the failure and implement a solution. Again, they have had server maintenance already, reloaded the entire game application, and have another maintenance window scheduled for the next few days. Again, they are fulfilling another obligation to the investors.

    The other thing is that some products take time to form a legitimate solution to issues. Many players issues that need a solution are content. Content takes time and it was already discussed they are already in Stage 2 development of solutions to content which will be released in the coming months.

    I am not suggesting that you tread lightly, but I am suggesting that calmer heads will help see the issues and respond in a more caring and understanding tone.

  • @nightmare247365 Wait, since when buying a product sold by a company = buying shares in this company ?????
    Did you guys receive Shares for the Rare or Microsoft companies ? Where is mine ?

    We are not investors lol! We are customers, and as such can claim a certain customer service.

  • @ironuzuka No, I was using it as an example. The fact we paid money for a game that is not yet complete in many players eyes, I feel as though I have invested in the end product. I have invested time in the alpha/beta tests/release and I have invested money in purchasing the game.

    That makes me an investor in the success of this game, not an investor in stock in this company.

  • @nightmare247365 Erm, where did I say that "the buyer has to beware"? That is literally the exact opposite of what I said. "Buyer beware" is immoral in a market-economy system like what most in the west live in and outright illegal in the European Union.

    That Rare has provided updates regarding technical problems with the game is moot: the staff who are doing the fixing are not the same staff who are producing content for the game, they should be working on something so there should have been a Thursday update rather than silence.

    Rare were asked specific questions about content in their own Q&As and they chose not to respond adequately, if at all. I'm running out of faith and the sheer preponderance of people determined to see that all content-related negative feedback stops makes the worst-case scenario more likely. Having been one of the few idiots who invested deep into Evolve three years ago, I'm seeing echoes and the people trying to shut-down content feedback are making me nervous.

    Caveat emptor will kill SoT. So please, stop.

  • @nightmare247365 I though I had missed out, just like I missed out on BTC.
    It is one thing to consider oneself something, but being something is an entire new issue.
    I am 200% with you on the customer satisfaction observation. But I am not an investor, and if I were an investor, I would have made them sign a contract guaranteeing a return on this investment.
    The crowdfunding people who injected money in OCULUS RIFT, believed they were investing, yet when the guy sold his idea and concept, they got nothing more, than their head set, why ? Cause they weren't investors, just like we are not investors. Words carry meaning, history and legal values, we should not use them inappropriately; mainly to avoid confusion :p

    The only argument here is on the "service" they say the game is. If I subscribe to a service, I sign a contract stating what I can do, and what they offer ...

    As mentioned in an other thread, if anyone has money and time, please, sue, just so we know our rights to demand or lack of rights to ask for anything. Is this a final product, or a service ?
    I do not want to sue Rare to hurt them, I want to sue to clarify what the market is!

  • @Ironuzuka How long does one walk this earth to be so foolish?

    @Nightmare247365 Don’t waste your time. A lot of maturity needs to take place first.

  • @augunslingin Longer than 33 yo. Good thing no one crossed me yet. ^_^
    Keep your lord at home and in your heart, but do not bring your interpretation of His or Her or Its message on this forum. We all have different spiritual views, and instead of being offended, just forgive truly from the bottom of your heart. Unless you do so, you are the one insulting *****.

  • @Ironuzuka I need not say more. Truly sad. God bless you though.

  • @arecbalrin Me too actually :D tea and custard creams.

  • @arecbalrin said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    Erm, where did I say that "the buyer has to beware"? That is literally the exact opposite of what I said. "Buyer beware" is immoral in a market-economy system like what most in the west live in and outright illegal in the European Union.

    Caveat emptor will kill SoT. So please, stop.

    It has been a while since I have taken Latin, but Caveat emptor to the best of my knowledge literally means, Let the buyer beware. That the buyer should investigate all avenues that the goods are as promised before the purchase was completed. Therefore, if the Latin translation is correct, you are screaming let the buyer beware.

    If taken out of context you are wanting the ideas not to be oppressed. That is very different and I can agree with that fact. Ideas are great, many are idiotic, but valuable information is not. While ideas generate discussion, there also has to be the reason. It is unreasonable to demand new content RIGHT NOW. It takes the time and it takes effort. That is my point. Give the devs an opportunity to fix what is lacking/broken before we all yell and scream that "We Want Fishing or We Want New Ships or Progression Please or Disable CrossPlay" etc. These ideas are not new and may already be on the radar of the devs, but getting the servers to a functionally reliable status is 100% more necessary than the requests above.

    I am sorry you invested in Evolve and that it failed. I have invested in Dead by Daylight (only similar in a 4v1 game) and many think it is struggling. The truth is that SoT is different in both playstyle and the quality of the Backer. When THQ filed for Bankruptcy that was the sign that Evolve was pretty much done.

    Rare has the backing and support of Microsoft so unless MS wants to can one of the first exclusive crossplay games I don't see this going down the toilet.

  • @nightmare247365 Yes, you have absolutely taken me saying 'buyer beware is immoral and in many places illegal' out of context. I don't see how it could have been any more clearer though.

    I'm not sure how you then go off on a tangent about 'ideas', I can hardly follow what you are even saying.

    The devs have had years to get content ready for launch. They had multiple opportunities to answer questions put to them specifically about content and they gave non-responses. They are responsible for what they say and what they don't say and having failed to correct inaccurate information about the game circulating, this is something they could have addressed on the regular Thursday slot for their Youtube channel but they didn't.

    Evolve died because of publisher interference from 2K(who bought the IP) and because the developer failed to deliver content for months. When it did come it was too little, too late and then when Evolve had a resurgence when it went free-to-play, the same problem: there was nothing new. Most games do not get a second-chance but it was blown. All we have for SoT is a ball-park '3 months' for the first content update, the only thing we know will be in that update is Legendary Captain status, micro-transactions and pets. We don't know if the quest-structure will be overhauled, if new items will be available, if gameplay changes will happen etc. These have all been unanswered questions and the best Rare could manage was 'more soon' but there hasn't been anything.

    We trusted 'more soon' before release and then release came and people felt burned. The same people who said 'this is just a beta/scale test, there will be loads more at release' then changed to 'you got what you paid for, this is what we knew we'd be getting', no shame at all. They will help this game die faster if that looks to be where it is heading. It won't make it to the first content update. If this keeps up, I will seek a refund.

  • @capt-crunch1969 said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    @psycho-slash said in RARE give us an official statement.:

    Since I played like 50 hours from the release, I’ m Really happy with this purchase. Probably one of my best game of this generation and funniest experience. Actual content is enough to have lots of fun IMO. Tgis game is not about contents but about the way to you interact with other players. It’s incredible !

    Clearly you need to play other games this game is a early access game at best.

    I agree. These people won't be saying the game is fun 3 weeks down the road when there is literally no more new content lol. They are just burning themselves out on the same repetitive grind like many other terrible games such as Destiny... And then when 3 months has passed and the content drop is terrible, not too many people will hop back on.

176
Posts
56.9k
Views
76 out of 176