Time RARE gave SoT Community "Their" definition of Toxicity

  • SoT Twitter account posted the above tweet in the last hour, explaining that they have a "Zero Tolerance" to both cheating and Toxic players. From the replies to that tweet alone it does seem there is major confusion as to what qualifies as Toxic behaviour by players in SoT.

    One misconception as far as I can see comes in understanding PvP in SoT. I don't feel as though simply being a pirate and in engaging in PvP according to the SoT pirate code is toxic behaviour. So stealing chests or attacking other crews is acceptable because you know, Pirates be pirates, but when the pirate code is broken however, when the aim is to spoil the fun of others, for example constantly chasing down a lesser ship simply to spawnkill and be verbally abusive I would consider toxic behaviour.

    I would also say that any in game chat communication that would violate the T&Cs of Xbox LIVE should be considered toxic behaviour, something this community has seen happen more recently when popular streamers have used been verbally abusive on stream to provide entertainment on their audience, but clearly would be a violation of Xbox LIVE T&Cs which in any other game on Xbox LIVE would earn a communication ban or worse for such behaviour. Bearing in mind that Sea of Thieves is a PEGI 12 rated game played over Xbox LIVE both via console or PC and Windows 10.

    So the problem is, what exactly is RARE's definition of toxicity, because we have a clash of cultures right now from Xbox players and PC Players where on the PC side watching streams and seeing verbal abuse alongside aggressive PvP gameplay as one and the same as being acceptable. We can link multiple videos on YouTube of examples of streamers behaviour that would not be acceptable in any other game over Xbox LIVE and it is also very clear that the last two dev update videos have been hinting at changes as a result of the recent increase in attention from streamers (double gun exploit, hiding other player gamertags so they cant be harrassed by a streamer's audience or spammed with invites clearly a reaction to this recent spotlight)

    In order to move this game forward and build on the recent spotlight thanks to big streamers on Twitch returning to this game, RARE really needs to clarify what they believe is Toxicity in the game that should be removed via banning as right now, its muddy waters blacker than Kraken's water.

    I welcome any thoughts on this.

  • 47
    Post
    33.8k
    Visualizzazioni
  • @cokney-charmer I agree with you on this one.

    The word "Toxic" can be taken in many forms. Too many to count. And where one person deems a statement toxic, the other deems it acceptable.

    Some countries and cultures see some of the so called toxicity as humour where others see it as insulting and unnacceptable.

    Rare need to set down some firm do's and dont's before they start swinging around the ban hammer as they cannot ban alot of people due to being "toxic" if they havent clarified there red lines.

    I agree if it breaches Xbox's Red lines then it should be the same for the game itself. The dev team just need to run with Microsoft's Guidelines and not their own. That way it prevents any clash

  • @cokney-charmer I thought that's what the pirate code was supposed to be?

    It should be obvious that attacking and sinking another ship is intended gameplay and therefore by definition is not in itself toxic, although a lot of newer players don't seem to understand this.

    Trolling your own crew is clearly toxic, although the same behaviour amongst a group of friends might just be banter and messing.

    MS ToS is pretty clear on what constitutes toxicity in terms of voice/chat comms. I'm surprised that action hasn't been taken over some things I've seen streamed. It needs to be reported firstly, but secondly MS don't exactly have a great reputation for taking action when reports are made of abusive communication (no personal experience here, just what I've heard other people say, could be exaggerated)

    Do you want Rare to spell out - don't do this, this is fine etc?

    I mean a lot of it is just obvious common sense. Don't use foul language, don't insult people, don't harass people repeatedly for no reason, don't sabotage your own crew.

    Generally though if people just tried to behave with a bit of honour and personal integrity this wouldn't be an issue. That's RL advice though not just for video games.

    What you put out into the world is what you get back. If toxic behaviour is how you get your kicks you're going to end up with a toxic worldview, because your entire reality will be impacted negatively by your lack of discipline in restraining your toxic urges and behaviours (we all have them). Those unrestrained urges will spill over into how you think and relate to the world in general and it will be to your own detriment. That's a problem that's far harder to fix than just turning off your xbox.

  • @boxcar-squidy you answered your own question if you can say you have seen streamers behave in a way that is against the pirate code and Xbox LIVE T&Cs and known to RARE yet they are considering working with them.

    I would also refer you to the tweet RARE put out and the replies to it, just look to see the difference of people thinking its only about PVP, the pirate code is now honestly out of date when you have a "streamer" say F the Pirate code to his audience who then agree with him, makes it irrelevant then.

    SoT community is divided between those who have played since launch in 2018 to the Pirate Code and those in 2019 watching popular people disregarding it and acting as they do which then encourages a whole new element to the community that follow what the streamers do over what values RARE still think every player upholds.

    They do not, and its time for 2019 with SoT for RARE to step up clarify it again based on recent popularity and spotlight.

    IMO

  • @cokney-charmer yeah I don't disagree with you. Just wanted clarification as to whether you wanted Rare to spell it out in detail as a list of behaviours that aren't acceptible.

    It really shouldn't need explaining, but here we are in 2019, where through some strange twist of fate people actually need to be told how to behave and how not to behave towards other human beings.

    As for the streamers thing. The videos are right there, why not report them yourself? MS can only act when stuff is reported to them, they're not going to watch every clip of xbox live gameplay on the net to see if somebody broke the ToS. If they were reported and MS didn't act, that's not anything Rare have control over.

    I think your suggestion has merit. Afaik the Pirate Code was developed in Beta/Alpha? Maybe it's time for a clearer code that takes account of some of the issues that have become more prevalent since the game went live.

    Codes need enforcing though. You can have the fanciest rules ever devised for a multiplayer game, but they're just words unless they're backed up by action when the rules are broken.

    We're clearly not a community that self-polices though. I had hopes that one day the PLs and experienced players would be the ones to enforce fair play, protect new players against griefers/trolls/KoS crews and keep the seas relatively fair for all. Nobody seems to have taken it upon themselves to pursue this as a legitimate form of gameplay though.

    I can imagine a great cop buddy drama about two PLs in their patrol sloop, covering their beat on the mean seas of SoT. One a hardboiled old school fella, with a bit of a drinking problem, the other a rookie, only just turned PL. Keeping the seas safe for the simple merchant, helping sailors free trapped rowboats, and trying to stitch someone up for the multiple homicide and Galleon sinking that happened over at cannon cove before the Chief blows a gasket.

  • @cokney-charmer When they are talking about toxicity they are talking about racism and extreme vulgar words not some mean words towards each other because of the fact that we are pirates.

  • @faceyourdemon That's the thing though. You can be pretty toxic without ever using a bad word. You can be toxic without saying a word. A silent player who joins your crew to turf your loot overboard and constantly drop the anchor is a bigger annoyance than a 10 year old shouting the new word they just learned in school at you on the ferry.

    Sometimes things are vague because they're hard to tie down to specifics.

    Take spawn camping - toxic? The answer isn't clear. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. There's a lot of ifs and buts and caveats. It's hard to fully encapsulate that reality in a set of rules that can be easily deciphered by anyone who doesn't hold a law degree.

    Then we have to communicate those rules to kids, teenagers and those with limited cognitive capabilities in such a way that they understand, agree with and follow those rules.

    All this in a game that has always been about "tools not rules" so players do come in with an anything goes attitude already, especially if they learned about the game from watching streamers play.

    Worth trying? Definitely.

    Is it possible? Unclear.

  • Perhaps to define it loosely, Anything contrary to the good-natured fun of being a pirate.

    You can tell the difference between those who attack you that are just trying to be pirates, and those who want to insult you and make you lesser than them.

    For Rare to define every type of instance is difficult as context is ever changing word meaning.

    Maybe you just know it when you encounter it?

    So if you feel like someone was, report it and let Rare decide.

  • @dyfrin that is the very reason why there is confusion in the community about this. Right now its as loosely defined as possible.

    RARE today have declared zero tolerance for cheating and toxicity yet we as players can see various degrees of Toxicity from in game and streamers and as in my original post, much of the things you can now see on social media and youtube/twitch/MIXER is behaviour that can violate Xbox LIVE T&Cs not to mention the Pirate Code for the game itself.

    Time to strip away the grey areas, declare what RARE defines as toxicity and hopefully do it before the next big update of Feb 6th where everything SoT for 2019 begins.

  • @cokney-charmer said:

    So the problem is, what exactly is RARE's definition of toxicity, because we have a clash of cultures right now from Xbox players and PC Players where on the PC side watching streams and seeing verbal abuse alongside aggressive PvP gameplay as one and the same as being acceptable.

    That didn't take long :P blame one platform.. especially since xboxlive has been known for toxicity for years now.
    Before SoT, I was in touch with xboxlive people in 2012 (ME3 multiplayer) and there seemed to be more sailors than in SoT :P

  • @boxcar-squidy spawn camping is not toxic attacking other crews is not toxic, we are pirates and we will do everything to be victorious (preferablly with honor).
    Dropping the anchor of your crew and tossing off loot or just staying afk to cash in on the other who works for it is toxic.

  • I was having fun with this game until another ship hit my boat with a cannonball! I had to use an entire plank to repair my ship! I reported all of the players involved and all of the players on their friendslists because of this clearly toxic behavior.

  • @clarionz said in Time RARE gave SoT Community "Their" definition of Toxicity:

    @cokney-charmer said:

    So the problem is, what exactly is RARE's definition of toxicity, because we have a clash of cultures right now from Xbox players and PC Players where on the PC side watching streams and seeing verbal abuse alongside aggressive PvP gameplay as one and the same as being acceptable.

    That didn't take long :P blame one platform.. especially since xboxlive has been known for toxicity for years now.
    Before SoT, I was in touch with xboxlive people in 2012 (ME3 multiplayer) and there seemed to be more sailors than in SoT :P

    misses the point by being defensive of a platform full of streamers all exploiting double gun glitch, third party cheating mods earning bans which is evident by the very tweet that inspired my original post and this discussion. I already said, there is current behaviour being shown that is a violation of Xbox LIVE T&Cs, with enough video evidence to not be ignored from particular streamers who have encouraged their audience to follow the same methods in the game currently.

    This is fact, and its PC focused mainly, but do not get me wrong, Xbox Players can be guilty of the very same which is why I believe it is necessary for RARE to clearly define what is "Toxicity" to them, what behaviour should come under zero tolerance and update the Pirate Code for 2019 and this sudden influx of streamers bringing more spotlight to the game.

    The focus of this is on Sea of Thieves and its community, all gaming platforms can be toxic, we as gamers are fully aware of this, my point still stands and comes a result of the influx of PC players all trying to copy the behaviour of infamous streamers, as well as RARE actually testing the waters to see if they can partner with this pure example of what I feel should fall under their zero tolerance of Toxicity.

    Thanks for the reply.

  • @cokney-charmer Not being defensive :) More like "take a look into a mirror first before pointing fingers"

    And yes, streamers mostly are on PC since consoles are slightly more limited with their streaming capabilities. But people watching the streams are from both platforms, probably about same ratio that are playing the game. And those imitating streamers actions.. same ratio again.
    Cheating can happen on both platforms, but I do agree that it's more likely to happen on PC side due to the hardware limitations. But it's not exclusive to PC.

  • Personal insults, vulgar language, racism, homophobia and trolling your own crew are what I consider should be deemed as toxic behaviour. Personally I'd probably not report any kind trash talk though as it doesn't bother me I actually find it funny but considering the age range of this game I get why its shouldn't be on the seas

    Personally don't think sinking another ship (with or without loot) even multiple times is toxic as its very much based on circumstance. So unless they are being abusive along with sinking you then I don't think its a problem

  • Recently i reported a very popular streamer after viewing one of his many video's. This streamer was verbally abusing other players and namecalling them.
    In my report i stated that although this streamer generates alot of new players (i asume), he is a role model since he has so many viewers. And he really is, since his behaviour is getting copied more and more.

    I try to clip as much as possible before i make a report though. And how much it sucks if im being spawncamped, that is not toxic behaviour in my opinion.

    My definition of toxic behaviour in SOT is namecalling, verbally abusing other people and / or deliberate troll people in or outside your crew.

  • @clarionz all you are being is defensive, like you didn't bother to read my original post of the theme of this dicussion and immediately shifted to "oh don't you speak of my beloved PC platform that way"....what RARE considers to be toxicity is the point of discussion and right now, the biggest conjecture on it is a result of SoT PC Community, and whilst Xbox players are not all angels.....be honest and see why this topic has to be discussed sensibly.

  • @cokney-charmer agreed, this is a people problem, not a platform problem.

    Platforms and balance are their own issue and we'll get some info on that today.

    Toxicity, and what constitutes toxic behaviour is another topic.

    I watched yesterdays live stream. Did anyone else see the guy calling the Devs "trash" after sinking them at the fort?

    Here's a question: using that specific example, was that guy being toxic to the developers or was that acceptible behaviour in the eyes of people here?

    I mean they were sunk, was there any need to call them "trash"? If that isn't toxic, what is it? Trash talk? Is trash talk toxic? Is trash talk acceptible? If you think it is acceptible, explain why. What are the positives that trash talk brings to the game? Why should people who are offended by trash talk accept this behaviour from other players? Where do you draw the line between trash talking and being toxic?

  • The game was toxic for my kids, they would log in, PVP players smash them, they would say this game is average, they left and never returned. No beginner protection, no peaceful servers for kids, stopped their progression and enjoyment, so your audience is reduced via this.

    I found it toxic for PVP, but flipped my play to start doing the same for fun, got to PL, no further progression, so anyone who hit me I griefed them for fun with keg attacks, not even bothering with the game missions. Never hitting innocent, but happy to grief others who start first. Lost interest and moved on to other games.

    Might play new content, but athenas for 3 hours etc can go bash it for us who have busy lives. Good luck out their pirates!

  • @cokney-charmer I did read your post. And I just pointed out that you're wrongly singling out one platform for a problem that is evenly distributed over whole community regardless the platform :)
    which you are very eager to do again.
    But if thats being defensive and, as you said: "oh don't you speak of my beloved PC platform that way", guess it is then.

  • @cokney-charmer I agree with some but not all of your post.

    'Zero-tolerance' should never be used lightly, but it is casually thrown around simply for rhetorical effect and I feel this is what is happening in this case. If there is zero-tolerance, then the rules need zero-ambiguity. That means anyone applying a penalty for behaviour has less, not more room to interpret the rules: they can't say 'wider context' justifies punishing someone who hasn't broken a rule and they can't invent new rules retro-actively as so many online moderators do.

    The Xbox Live code of conduct is here: https://www.xbox.com/en-gb/legal/codeofconduct and it is completely inadequate if Rare insist on zero-tolerance. It is full of ambiguity and enables a moderator to make open-ended decisions. You can not apply zero-tolerance without zero-ambiguity rules. 'Do not engage in illegal activity' is clear enough, but then it immediately gets confused with the addition of-

    "For example, do not: Threaten to physically hurt others. Spread lies about a person, a product or a group. Post nude photos knowing the subject of the photo meant for it to be kept private. Extort or threaten action unless you get something you want."

    It does not say which legal jurisdiction is applicable, so it's meaningless. It doesn't specify if it means behaviour that is only applicable within the game; is lying about someone's character or what they do in the game illegal? And how is a lie determined and by who? Does it mean attacking someone in the game, something the game explicitly allows you to do, can be considered IRL illegal now or treated as such as long as some opaque conditions apply?

    The Code of Conduct is also non-exhaustive, which is also a big no-no. It means rules can be made up as they go along, without having to be written down in the CoC first. How can people be expected to stick to the rules in a zero-tolerance system if it is not made clear beforehand what the rules are?

    Online interactions are not rated and this disclaimer exists in pretty much every game that's ERSB-rated, so should be utterly irrelevent.

  • @arecbalrin Good points.

    You hear a lot of people defend their right to say abusive things to people under the banner of free speech.

    Free Speech doesn't exist. In the USA your first ammendment protects you from Government censorship. It does not mean that you can say what you like without consequences. Libel/Slander/Defamation are all still crimes in the USA, free speech or not.

    The rest of the world, mostly, does not recognise freedom of speech/expression. There are laws in most countries against hate speech, incitement to violence, threatening behaviour, use of vulgar language, malicious use of electronic communication, harassment, discrimination and so on. They are enforced to varying degrees from country to country, but they exist nearly everywhere.

    SoT is available worldwide, so American laws are meaningless. MS ToS is the only law on MS's platform. But MS's ToS is open to interpretation. Who does the interpreting? Do we have the right to be tried by a jury of our peers? Is there oversight? Can a decision be appealed to an independent arbitrator?

    There's a real problem in enforcing these rules in the real world using the legal systems and precedents that have been devised over thousands of years. I'm not convinced that it is within Rare's power to solve the issue in SoT, zero tolerance or not.

    I personally think zero tolerance was just a poor choice of words to articulate "we take this very seriously and will act on any reports that you make to us, if they can be acted upon"

  • @boxcar-squidy I mostly in disagreement with your post.

    First on the issue of freedom of speech; you are doing what so many people do and confusing the principle of freedom of speech with the legalism of anti-censorship. That there is no law granting freedom of speech as a right does not mean the principle doesn't exist and when free-speech advocates try to argue their case, their opponents deliberately misunderstand and choose to interpret them as saying the law gives them freedom of speech. If anyone claims to believe in free speech but argues like this, they are a liar, they do not believe in freedom of speech. Yet most of the time their argument is prefaced with 'I am all for free speech' usually followed with 'but not without consequence' and then follows a very uninteresting exchange where they try to weasel out of defining what they mean by 'consequence'. When Reddit originally started, they promised like many sites do to be a 'platform for free speech', which would make no sense if free speech was merely a consequence of anti-censorship statutes rather than a principle that existed separate from the 2nd Amendment and other anti-censorship laws. Only once they stopped being a free-speech platform did they start pretending free speech has everything to do with the law and nothing to do with principle.

    Regarding legal jurisdication: no, just because SoT is worldwide does not make the laws of any specific jurisdication meaningless. Every single game I've played on a PC has required me to agree to terms and conditions and every single one of them states that the agreement is being made in a named legal jurisdication: usually the US state of Delaware, because of the specific rules there for corporations. However, several of the examples the Xbox CoC give are not illegal in Delaware. By not designating a jurisdication in a CoC which cites 'don't do anything illegal', it creates all sorts of problems. A player in Saudi Arabia could be offended if another player is a woman(in-game or real-life) and it could be a very real crime in Saudi Arabia and by not specifying a jurisdiction, Microsoft have not excluded Saudi Arabia's laws from applying.

    The issue is not that these rules need to be enforced IRL by legal systems, but that companies like Microsoft are outsourcing their rule-making but then butchering their very important legalese in how they interpret them.

  • This is an interesting discussion, one I've had many times with a variety of people. I think a lot of it comes down to respect and sportsmanship. The problem with defining toxicity is, ofcourse, that everyone interprets it differently.

    I think in this debate it is important to keep in mind that PvP is not toxic. It is part of the game, and not one person should see engaging in PvP as toxic behaviour. However, repeatedly going after the same ship, spawnkilling and trashtalking is going across that line. Verbally assaulting people, looking at Summit for example, while you attack them is toxic behaviour.

    But, if I encounter another player who misses a lot of shots and I tell them they missed and need to practice. Does that constitute as toxic? Most people would say no. But there are people who would argue the contrary. As evident by a crew I encountered the other day that called me out on being toxic when I laughed at their missed double-gunning and blew them up.

    I think it all comes down to respect and common sense. Don't be a racist, sexist, bigot. Don't verbally lash out because people do something in the game you don't like. Treat people how you would like to see yourself be treated. You don't want people to shout obscenities or be extremely vulgar and angry when you play videogames. If you do, I think you should re-consider. Why? Because it takes away from the game and is unnecessary. We all play games to have fun, and yes we all lose sometimes and get angry. But taking that anger out on other players by being abusive is crossing the line.

    I'm writing this on my phone, so I apologize for rambling. Hard to scroll back up and read what I wrote. Hope it makes sense.

  • @arecbalrin you seem to know more about the legal specifics than I do, so I'll defer to your greater knowledge.

    Here's a question for you though. There is a law, in my country, against malicious use of electronic communications. If someone sends me an abusive or hateful message on xbox live, that is covered (loosely) by that law. Am I then in my rights to report that person to the police? If MS says don't do anything illegal, and sending an abusive message over the internet is illegal here, you're saying that their ToS would make this players actions sanctionable, even though they might come from a country where no equivalent law exists?

    I mean, you normally can't get extradited for something that isn't a crime in the country you are being extradited from, but if you are convicted in absentia that could prevent you from ever travelling to that country or a country that has an extradition treaty with that country.

    Obviously this is a hypothetical situation and international arrest warrents are hopefully never going to be used against xbox live trolls (nor should they be) but are you saying that under the current ToS this is a thing that is possible?

    That seems a bit mad really. I mean we do live in a world where trolls have gotten streamers shot by police SWAT teams though, so I'm not sure I have the capacity to be surprised by how out of hand things can get anymore.

  • @arecbalrin yeah legal arguments are invalid anyway because as users of Xbox LIVE we signed their agreement to their policies, rules and T&Cs so its what they and RARE consider to be a violation of them through Toxicity.

    So whilst valid legal and freedom of speech points have been raised, I would rather not have the main point of this discussion be lost in hypothetical or points of legality.

    What does RARE consider to be Toxic enough to trigger their Zero Tolerance.....argument is that simply my friends.

  • @erinom3 You gone and done it now! You named him... the defenders of the Twitch realm will be descending upon us...

    😜

  • @boxcar-squidy If the person sending the message to you is from the same country (where the law is in effect) then that would technically be illegal. But if the person sends the message from a country where sending an abusive message is not against the law, then technically the so called crime has not been committed because it is not illegal from where he sent it/committed it.

    If that makes sense?

  • @octopus-lime that makes sense. I'm talking MS ToS here though. The ToS says don't do anything illegal. Not don't do anything illegal in your home country.

    I agree with @ArecBalrin here, MS ToS needs clarity, if it's going to be the bottom line in terms of rules.

    Tbh I think it's on MS to address toxicity across the entire XBL platform. Rare can only do so much in SoT, MS are the people who control XBL and it's on them to set and enforce rules and standards of behaviour.

    Rare can help define the specifics of MS's rules as they relate to SoT itself, but only if those rules are clear enough to provide specific examples of behaviours that aren't acceptible.

  • @boxcar-squidy It sounds like you're from the UK, as am I. What @Octopus-Lime said is correct: if they're in the same country(and have the same law the UK does concerning electronic communications), then they can be considered to have broken the law.

    A few years ago there was the Gary McKinnon case where he could have been prosecuted in the UK under malicious use of a computer, which would have protected him from extradition to the US relating to the same use of a computer but with far more serious consequences. That was a fustercluck. He had committed the crime in the UK, it doesn't matter that the alleged harm happened in the US.

    But this is yet another reason why companies should not include 'don't do anything illegal' in a contract, ToS or CoC without declaring what laws of what country are to be followed. You'd think companies full of people who write code would understand the importance of making it clear what set of instructions are to be followed.

  • @arecbalrin I'm from Ireland but, apart from us being nobody's subjects here and beholden to neither kings nor queens, our laws are exactly the same, for the most part.

    Thanks, yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

    Seems like a nonesense sort of thing to include in ToS then unless you are tying it to a specific juristiction.

  • @boxcar-squidy said in Time RARE gave SoT Community "Their" definition of Toxicity:

    @octopus-lime that makes sense. I'm talking MS ToS here though. The ToS says don't do anything illegal. Not don't do anything illegal in your home country.

    Yea I get that but if it isn't illegal in your country then by virtue of that law you haven't committed a crime or done anything illegal. Probably a bit of a legal loop hole/grey area.

    Also would like to point out that I'm not supporting toxic behavior, personally I consider smack talking in game as toxic.

  • @octopus-lime said in Time RARE gave SoT Community "Their" definition of Toxicity:

    @boxcar-squidy said in Time RARE gave SoT Community "Their" definition of Toxicity:
    Also would like to point out that I'm not supporting toxic behavior, personally I consider smack talking in game as toxic.

    Me too. I tend to look at it along the lines of "would this be an acceptible way of talking to an opponent if we were playing a sport"

    I mean, you don't tend to see Premier League footballers calling out the other team as trash or using derogatory slurs against one another (and footballers aren't exactly renowned for being model citizens). If you dishonour your opponent you dishonour yourself.

    Even if the words or behaviour are harmless when the intent is to make the other person feel bad, that's toxic. How do you prove intent though? Because the number one, go to excuse is always "but I was only joking"

    Also, sometimes people feel bad about things that aren't toxic. They get sunk and lose their loot. It feels bad, therefore the player that sank them is toxic, that seems to be some people's logic.

    The game is about gathering and protecting your loot though. So someone attacking you for your loot isn't doing it to make you feel bad, they're doing it because that's the game.

    To be honest, as a term, the word toxic seems to be losing meaning the more often it gets used.

47
Post
33.8k
Visualizzazioni
1 su 47