@fysics3037 said in Brigantine Speed:
@goldsmen There's very real evidence that I was on the second best brig crew in the game, so yeah when it comes to brig I'll use that to "appeal to credibility". And no a brig is definitely easier to sink than a galleon. I don't think you're fully aware of just how bad brig is if you think you're equally likely to get one balled on galleon as you are on brig. Brig sits lower in the water making it easier to just arch cannons directly at the other person, especially the helm. There's one tiny area you can bucket out of meaning you can just slam that area with cannons and blunders and get one balls/backsplashes. It also has the most vulnerable wheel making blunder rotation a million times more powerful. And it, in my experience, has the easiest masts to destroy, due to them having a total of only two chainshots of hp, being massive, being furthest away from helm to catch/repair, and taking forever to pick back up if they do fall.
Galleon on the other hand has a very defensible back sail and wheel, often never falling/full breaking if the helm is at all competent. A good bilge is easily able to hold off the shots for a majority of the battle, being able to manage 4 tier 3's and 2 tier 2's at max. There is also a flex that is always able to come down and help with buckets, for a minuscule disadvantage compared to needing the flex on brig. And that flex basically lets you bucket an entire sides worth of holes so you aren't really at any risk of losing if you're playing perfectly. You sit higher on the water meaning that you can afford to play further away and making it harder for one balls to just be aimed directly at you. People aiming for top deck aren't causing bottom deck damage as well, meaning you are typically only "in trouble" in one area at a time, with a good crew ofc. There are 4 cannons, with only 2-3 people actually utilizing them, meaning you aren't susceptible to "losing" cannons to someone just repetitively hitting it. And again, even if they try to force you off cannons they won't have any bottom deck pressure. You also have 3 other people that can go res, making that much simpler. Also the ladders on galleon are a million times easier to watch as a helm compared to the ladders on brig, due to the ones on galleon being much longer and having a flared out section that makes you easy to spot.
There's no scenario where the galleon is weaker than brig. In fact in a majority of scenarios the galleon is tankier than the sloop. The only area the sloop is truly tankier is just if the sloop turtles.
Simply stating the same claim about being "second best" again and saying there is evidence while not providing does not mean anything beyond continued boasting.
You continue to put words in my mouth where i never said something. I did not say equal chance of being one balled on a galleon, i said it is something that affects every ship, i never brought probability into the mix in that regards.
"easiest mast to destroy due to having two chain shots to destroy" You just described the sloop as well my friend. The galleons 3 masts does give it a bit of an advantage, but that advantage comes at the cost of taking more people to operate those sails to counteract the size of the crew. And as for the 4 cannons on a galleon, if all 4 people are using those cannons, that is in 1 of 2 situations, the crew has no idea what they are doing and dont have people bucketing, or your ship has been disabled well enough you wouldnt be fighting back even if they had one less cannon.
The galleons number of cannons does not account for as much as you give credit for when it is the hardest ship to maneuver and floods so fast that it always needs 1-3 people bucketing and fixing depending how much damage it has taken. When a ship turns like a brick and takes the most babysitting and teamwork to keep afloat, you dont have the luxury of having all cannons operated at once if the ship is even at an angle to hit another ship that can outmaneuver it.
I really see that this argument is going to go nowhere since you are providing points that underplay the amount of effort a galleon takes to manage well, keep claiming that i have said things i have not expressly stated, and then use a boast about being the second best brigantine and claiming there is proof of that, when the only proof you appear to have is the boast its self. "Im the second best because there is proof that im the best because i say there is" Is not proof of anything, and does not belong in debate, that is a baseless boast, not proof of any arguments you are making.
Im going to leave this debate with you here with the points provided, since there is genuinely no point debating some one who half of their argument is boast with barely under double the hours in game as my self, and anecdote of "i experienced it". This is clearly not a debate for you, its something else entirely.