Current State of PC Match-Making

  • Hello fellow pirates!

    My name may or may not be new to you, and I'm far from new around these parts. My voice is usually reserved for insider stuff, or finding my lost 1.3mil gold that some blue and gold ship stole from me amongst the alpha shores (aRrrr curse you!). Usually I upvote similar opinions rather than posting, but nothing's been said about this from what I can tell, so here goes;

    • Input-Based Match-Making for PC players, with or without regard of platform. (I know console already has this, I'm talking more with the PC game)

    The introduction of disabling cross-play was an interesting addition - one that was a definite step in the right direction for casual console players (one that I feel was needed at launch) - but I also feel it didn't help casual PC players have an improved experience. I am one that plays both PC and Console, although these days I'm feeling more inclined to play Console and turn cross-play off, which is a real shame considering how amazing this game looks and plays on PC.

    I would never consider myself a veteran of SoT's PvP element, nor would I say I can use KB&M as easily as I can slip into using a controller, or as accurately as some can. From experience, and more predominantly recently - since Steam's platform has been gifted this wonderful game - being placed with such experts (on PC) who use KB&M during PvP combat, it is made evidently clear I am at a disadvantage. I come to this conclusion both from how they can snipe near instantly with amazing accuracy, and from the bunny hopping - although that bit's less PC specific.

    There's no harm in admitting I'm a casual player. I have little to no interest in taking this game's PvP too seriously since it's a game at the end of the day and we're all here to have fun no matter what happens. I do however feel like there should be some kind of accurate matchmaking to better reflect this, instead of being placed into unfair situational PvP. If we want balance, we need to address this. The only best thing I could come up with would be Input-Based MM for PC players too, which still isn't perfect but it's a step in the right direction for PC.

    Pure PvP puts everyone on a level playing field, and people who enjoy fair PvP should strive for these such things to happen. If you're sat there reading this and disagreeing with that statement, I can only imagine you get your kicks from abusing such advantages, to which I feel disappointed that you're allowed to continue. I don't want PvE servers either, this game never has been about the PvE experience at heart, even from early alpha, I just want a fair PvP experience and I'm not alone.

    Yes I know I said I use a controller on PC, you're allowed to judge me. But silently pls, there's more than just me that does this.

    Catch you on the seas Pirates. Oh and if you find my gold lemme know. k byee

  • 35
    Posts
    27.7k
    Views
  • @thornbush42 Forgot to say, interested on everyone's opinions regarding this topic, I will read every one :)

  • @thornbush42

    Pure PvP puts everyone on a level playing field, and people who enjoy fair PvP should strive for these such things to happen. If you're sat there reading this and disagreeing with that statement, I can only imagine you get your kicks from abusing such advantages, to which I feel disappointed that you're allowed to

    You're assuming that people who steal loot and fight other ships do it because they can sink, cannon, and do ship vs ship combat. Most people are sinking ships and killing people in adventure because they want loot, if they wanted to sink ships and SvS then they would go to arena, as you can easily find people who also want to fight. If you're trying to get your point across and want people to be on your side, telling them that they are bad and that they should be disappointing at themselves for doing what they're doing is the wrong way to go about it.

    I'm confused on what you're suggesting. You said that you don't want a PvE only server, but that we should split up the casual players from the PvPers. In doing so you would be splitting people up into separate servers, what are you suggesting? If you are asking that we just split up the playerbase into people who are ONLY casual players and people who are ONLY PvPers:

    Developers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_yrN70591Q&feature=youtu.be&t=3578

  • @kaijoi
    I'm not assuming anything about what goes on about the seas at all, I'm only talking from personal experience, which isn't different from what you are saying at all, that PvP happens to gain rewards, since PvP without rewards isn't PvP it's griefing. Also I'm only saying I'm disappointed in those that abuse such systems, or lack their of, in order to gain an advantage. I'm talking minority, less than a few % probably, but they will exist wherever PvP comes. KB&M vs Controller is a huge debate, and it's not hard to see why, but it is easy to abuse such differences from a KB&M side since they could and would gain an easier experience against the opposition.

    I enjoy PvP immensely, but that's because it's part of the game, a game that I love to play in spare time. I'm no veteran or expert and don't care to be. Stripping the game of PvP in terms of adding wholly PvE servers would be doing this game a disservice, something I strongly disagree with. Neither am I suggesting we split based on experience or play time, since that could be abused with just making an alt account, and that opens up another can of worms best left untouched.

    I understand the clip, I've seen it posted multiple times in multiple places and I agree with it. There's no Community without unity. But, Input-Based splitting is kind of a need, so much so that console already has it. This isn't necessarily out of arms reach or a stretch too far. Including PC's controller-only players in the currently xbox-only controller-only lobbies wouldn't require too much work surely? It would reunite some players too, and I don't think it would create any more unfairness in the game imo obvs.

    Also, thanks for taking the time to reply. I really do appreciate it, keep it up :)

  • I dont think its a good idea, the mm based on platform should be more than enough.

    It is curious however, that they talk a lot about interactivity and social stuff ingame being a major interest in the making... when ingame all that I have seen is the contrary.

    Hell, even emotes are into paywalls.

  • @thornbush42

    Nice to see you posting your opinons as a topic.

    I do also agree that they should have made it imput based instead of platform base as the main contention was always around the imputs. An xbox console is just a low end dedicate gaming pc. The really is no functional difference. For faster loading you can by an SSD and you can mod/hack an xbox just like a PC it runs on windows 10 just a slightly modified version. So really the only legitimate compliant at the time a least sas the use of a Kb/m which wasn't officialy supported by MS back then. Now it is and it has been demonstrated that KB/m has certain advantages over controllers in certian instances with repeated attempts at adding assist to bring controllers to paridy with KB/m failing. However the gap has narrowed.

    Because of this like you stated also effect causal pc players with low to mid spec pc that play on controler.

    This benifits both sides a now it wouldnpt be seen as disabling crossplay but instead allow more player to play with eachother on an even playingfeild.

  • @vendel-chief-07
    A simple change to input would make it more fair do you not agree? I understand in it's current form it is adequate for console players, but I think it could be more adequate for more players if this minor change was done. Thanks for your input.
    @ENF0RCER
    A like-minded fellow, thank you for your input also.

  • @thornbush42

    As someone who very actively voiced my distaste for Controller vs KB&M crossplay right from the start, and actively campaigned for the removal of forced crossplay, I can understand why those of you who like to play with controllers on PC have combat issues against the KB&M set up and would wish to also have an option for your own servers against PC/Controller players.
    I wish you luck in your pursuit.

    But i will never support those using controllers on PC joining the Xbox servers community.
    The gameplay improved 10,000% once we got rid of that cursed crossplay. 🤤

  • @needsmokes

    It certainly did, didn't it? Maybe an inquiry on %age of servers which are xbox-only compared to total number of servers would shed light on whether or not having another set of restricted servers would be feasible or if it would create too many empty servers. Either way, something should be said about the empty servers in general right, or am I the only one feeling that way?

    Either way, to an extent I can understand your initial rejection of adding any form of pc players to the currently only-controller servers. However, as someone has stated in a previous reply which I can personally agree with, the only real advantage a PC player has over an xbox is load times. In this regard, something needs to be done about load times in general. I feel the gate should be opened a specific amount of time after you die, not after you finally load into the ferry of the damned specifically. Otherwise it just comes down to frame rate, and I feel like when this next xbox comes out, which from the sounds of it could be running 4k at 60fps on a console, this area is going to be null and void. However, currently, this is an obstacles to take into account.

    Thank you also for your contribution, you are most welcome :)

  • @thornbush42

    I always stated that PC and xbox users should have been treated equally and without seperation. The option of input was given to both platforms and always advocated that the controller only servers should have been just that, purely input based.

    If Rare would have stayed true to their vision and design mantra we would have never been split and both platforms would have been included in the controller only option. The business end won and has determined to not upset the console xbox community and their exclusive club feeling.

    That battle has been fought and lost with the introduction of the xbox only version. You are a bit late to the party, but good luck.

  • @cotu42

    But we can keep fighting. Without fighting, we wouldn't have xbox cross-play disabled as an option. With the introduction of Steam, the amount of PC controller players will grow expediently, as will KB&M. Hopefully more coal to the fire. Thanks for the reply however, happy sailing :)

  • @thornbush42

    I just don't suffer any unexplained deaths vs Xbox Players.
    I don't suffer any horrendous lag facing players on Xbox.
    I'm no longer running in tar swinging an enormous war hammer in combat vs a nimble jumping flea with a 20ft blade in close combat.

    There could be enough players on PC using controllers only who want what you want, but they haven't been very vocal about it. So I'm not sure it will be in the pipeline anytime soon. After all, most of the forum users here have posted numerous times there is zero disparity between controller and KB&M.
    It's all written in the many hundreds of crossplay threads from days gone by.

  • @thornbush42

    You have my support, but I spent to much time on this specific topic of input. I don't think steam will change much to the equation at all. I am not going to be a big voice on this topic, I have no interest in having repeat conversations that I had in the mega thread regarding the xbox version. Go have a read in the archive if you're interested in the arguments made, be warned the hatred for PC is strong.

    If you succeed please try and have them open those servers to the xbox community as well. They will still have their exclusive version and doubt it will ever be taken away, but the invitation should be given to them to join us once again.

    The whole rivalry and exclusive of platforms is so artificial and fabricated. We are all gamers, the type of machine that runs the game shouldn't matter.

    Edit: for your information load screens are based on the harddrive that one uses. Xbox users can also use a solid state drive, just an external one. Don't let people fool you to think it is a PC only perk and will be default on the new gen xbox with an internal SSD.

  • @cotu42

    Well man I appreciate your input, I followed the mega thread closely when it was a thing, as you said though not many voices said anything about controllers on pc, in fact I'm struggling to remember a single valid instance from a perspective similar to mine.

    Anyhow, I can just keep talking to people and raising the issue enough for it to get some re-found attention, especially with the new xbox coming out soon and smearing the line of advantage between pc and console somewhat more.

    I appreciate your support, and anyone else's for that matter, and I know Rare like to read these posts from time to time so we can only hope.

    Imo there only advantage a controller player on PC has over Xbox is frame rate, load times, and delusion. 2/3 of those are solvable with an external SSD like you said and a little less bias / obscene unfounded hatred. These seas used to be a lot greener!

    Thanks again :)

  • @needsmokes

    I understand. Again though, frame rate are most of the problems here, and potentially a wild theory here could be that most consoles run wirelessly unlike PC (confirmation needed of course, but could be likely the case). Framerates and lag can be helped with newer hardware though, with the new xbox around the corner that boasts 4k60, this gap is going to be miniscule now. I don't know, only time will tell. Rare are working magic with that machine I can only imagine.

  • @needsmokes

    Oh and thanks for contributing pirate!

  • @thornbush42

    I'm not assuming anything about what goes on about the seas at all, I'm only talking from personal experience, which isn't different from what you are saying at all, that PvP happens to gain rewards, since PvP without rewards isn't PvP it's griefing. Also I'm only saying I'm disappointed in those that abuse such systems, or lack their of, in order to gain an advantage. I'm talking minority, less than a few % probably, but they will exist wherever PvP comes. KB&M vs Controller is a huge debate, and it's not hard to see why, but it is easy to abuse such differences from a KB&M side since they could and would gain an easier experience against the opposition.

    I think I'm having a hard time understanding you because you're speaking in a very broad context. When you said:

    Pure PvP puts everyone on a level playing field, and people who enjoy fair PvP should strive for these such things to happen. If you're sat there reading this and disagreeing with that statement, I can only imagine you get your kicks from abusing such advantages, to which I feel disappointed that you're allowed to continue.

    I assumed you meant people who PvP should always be looking for a fair playing field no matter what. That anything that gives anyone an advantage shouldn't be in the game, extra resources, cursed cannonballs, and better food should be something that we need to take out of the game as that counts as an advantage, and removes the level playing field. And I also didn't understand what you meant when you said, "Input-Based MM for PC players," That was my fault. I thought you were saying something like, "If you want to do voyages then you should get to choose a server where only people doing voyages can go, and if you want to PvP then you can go to these PvP servers. I understand now that your point was just to allow PC controller players to play with Xbox players.

    As for allowing PC players with controller to go into the Xbox only servers, I'm not sure about the logistics behind it. I know most games don't do things like that as all you would have to do is plug in a controller, search for a game, then unplug the controller and go right back to using KB&M. I'm sure you could find a way to prevent that, I know some Xbox games don't allow Xbox players to plug in a KB&M to play the game, and you are only able to use controller, but I don't know of any PC games that do that kind of thing.

    I'm sure that Rare could find a way to do it, but I'm not sure if they want to spend the time and resources to bring a feature like this into the game. Simply because most people on PC don't play on controller, and the few who do aren't in an outcry like the Xbox players were. I'm sure if there were enough people advocating for PC controller players to be in the Xbox lobbies then Rare would probably add it. Me personally, I don't mind the idea, sure you will get faster load times and higher FPS being in the Xbox lobbies, but the main complaints from Xbox players are the fact that they are hindered by the controller, and not the lack of FPS. So while FPS and load times would be a factor, I don't see a good enough reason to not add it as of right now.

    But I'm not a PC controller player. I started playing this game with controller, got kill by someone with a KB&M, then I swapped off of controller as I didn't want to be at a disadvantage. To me it seems like the problem could just be fixed by people swapping over to a keyboard and mouse, rather than getting into a fight with the Xbox players about how your load times and FPS will give you an advantage, as well as Rare having to make it impossible to swap back to KB&M after you've searched. But if enough people wanted this to happen, and the Xbox players didn't have a lot of push back, then it probably could work.

  • The moment the Xbox got Kb&M support every opt out argument was invalidated.
    Choose with what to play and what serves you the best. There was no need to split the playerbase.
    They better would have worked around mechanics to be not exploitable and make it so that there is no huge advantage using this or that. Btw controller has also benefits compared to Kb&M in several situations.

    If you split the playerbase further and further there is no shared world.

    People already talk about different things when they talk about "the game" it's not clear what they talk about specifically and it's not always clear what the circumstances are.
    If they play xbox only or Arena for example.
    The more groups we have, the less we can discuss around the big picture.

  • @thornbush42

    You didn't follow the thread closely enough I believe. There were people that made your case and those that fought hard against the exclusive nature of the feature.

    The same people that state that they would fight you tooth and nail to ensure you are and remain excluded. You thank them, yet as long as you don't play on a branded machine they will never accept you and will work against your case of input based matchmaking.

    I truly suggest you read the mega thread.

  • are people that use controllers on PC really a thing? i mean, surely you could count them all on one hand, yes?

  • @tehstepford
    There's a big enough community to warrant a discussion, but not big enough to warrant implementation. Sea of Thieves is a very casual game, because it's not a full on FPS game where there are competitive ranks and SR in play, some people choose to not make the switch to KB&M as they don't see a reason to use it because this game isn't too competitive. I'd say that when I use the SOT discord 1/10 times someone will say that they use controller, and that's only the times that they admit to using it, that doesn't count all of the times that someone did use controller but never admitted it.

    So yes, while there are probably tens of thousands of players who use controller on PC for Sea of Thieves, they're still in the minority and most people will use KB&M. But I can guarantee that most people who do use controller aren't taking the game seriously, and are just trying to have a casual experience without much fighting or PvP.

  • @bugaboo-bill

    Btw controller has also benefits compared to Kb&M in several situations.

    In what situations would it be better to have a controller instead of a KB&M?

  • @kaijoi said in Current State of PC Match-Making:

    @bugaboo-bill

    Btw controller has also benefits compared to Kb&M in several situations.

    In what situations would it be better to have a controller instead of a KB&M?

    Cannons; wheel...

  • @cotu42 said in Current State of PC Match-Making:

    The whole rivalry and exclusive of platforms is so artificial and fabricated. We are all gamers, the type of machine that runs the game shouldn't matter.

    Edit: for your information load screens are based on the harddrive that one uses. Xbox users can also use a solid state drive, just an external one. Don't let people fool you to think it is a PC only perk and will be default on the new gen xbox with an internal SSD.

    No, it isn't. PCs are inherently superior to consoles in every way. Buying a console buys into a closed and artificially restrictive system. The up-front cost for a good PC is daunting but the number of advantages it provides significantly, and I mean significantly outweighs the drawback.

  • I would like to share the fact that matchmaking in general is corrupt.
    starting matchmaking with xbox-(controller)onlym you still get matchmade into a server with pc players.

    PC has the inherent advantage of custom setups, generally going for 60+ fps, up to 120 fps (depending on how much money you spend on your setup). console(xbox one) is stuck at 30fps. Meaning PC can do up to 4x the calculations and input-detections per 1 frame of the xbox.
    Edit: this should be solved with the new xbox comming out this winter, up to 120fps and should have only 8ms controller input lag(wireless), which is comparable to pc input detection but still not up to the 1-5 ms lag between wired keyboards and mouses.

    Lately the Steam Community joined in, adding another 1,2-2million players to pc playerbase. My honest opinion is that they should give PC their own servers, same for xbox as they will never be able to compete against PC specs.

    I'm getting really annoyed when i start playing an xbox only server and then after 2 hours i get fcked over because some random pc player joined the server and immediately starts to hunt and grief the shiz out of boats, just for fun not for loot. (also interesting for streamers to promote toxic behaviour to the playerbase).

    that's what i think about the whole cross-play issue.

  • @blam320 @SkylaMark

    So, your argument is that to be able to have a fair input based matchmaking one must downgrade their PC to an xbox and pay more money? Instead of the person with the lesser machine upgrade their machine to have a better experience?

    The specs of the machine you have is based on the money you can spend. A PC can be way better than a xbox, it can also be less. The next generation xbox will be significantly better than the current generation and will fall under the xbox tag.

    Spend more money and get a better machine. This including the purchase of an external SSD to decrease load times on a xbox one, so yes it is not a PC only perk. Welcome to the real world.

    Xbox are closed systems, but can be upgraded and improved with new models, external extensions and new generations every couple of years. They are a decent price to quality experience.

    I don't think demanding people to change their system and buy a different machine to enable a input based matchmaking system is a good practice and yet is exactly what they did.

    If you want to read more please just read the mega thread on xbox only option. This is a crossplay title... the game should at least provide a crossplay option.

  • @cotu42 said in Current State of PC Match-Making:

    @blam320

    So, your argument is that to be able to have a fair input based matchmaking one must downgrade their PC to an xbox and pay more money? Instead of the person with the lesser machine upgrade their machine to have a better experience?

    What part of "PCs are inherently superior" doesn't make sense?

    The specs of the machine you have is based on the money you can spend. A PC can be way better than a xbox, it can also be less. The next generation xbox will be significantly better than the current generation and will fall under the xbox tag.

    Spend more money and get a better maching. This including the purchase of an external SSD to decrease load times on a xbox one. Welcome to the real world.

    Xbox are closed systems, but can be upgraded and improved with new models, external extensions and new generations every couple of years. They are a decent price to quality experience.

    No they aren't. With the Xbox you're forced to pay an additional fee to access online play, and on top of that you don't get nearly as large of a games library, on top of zero utility such as web browsing, video and document editing, etc.

    I don't think demanding people to change their system and buy a different machine to enable a input based matchmaking system is a good practice and yet is exactly what they did.

    If you want to read more please just read the mega thread on xbox only option.

    You're putting words into my mouth. I was replying to a specific part of your post, where you say the rivalry between Consoles and PCs is artificial. I'm pointing out that it's not an artificial rivalry, and you're trying to insinuate that I'm making a statement about input-based matchmaking. You can use Controllers on a PC, did you know that? You've always been able to use controllers on PC. For the longest time you couldn't use KBM on a Console.

  • @galactic-geek
    How so? Can they turn faster? I've used controller way back so it's possible that they've changed it, but I didn't think that you can turn the wheel faster or turn the cannons faster.

  • @blam320

    The rivalry between the players on PC and xbox is artificial. The gamers are gamers, they are people that play games... The difference between the two is the hardware that they bought and the brand it has attached to it. The specs of the system shouldn't be relevant, PCs have all different performances.

    PC is not inherently superior, it is an open system that can be superior based on the price tag you pay. Go look up the spec requirements of the game. Go buy a budget laptop and tell me that is better than the next generation xbox or a xbox one with an external SSD. In the world you get what you pay for, the variety in the PC world is huge... also the additional benefits of a PC over a dedicated gaming machine a console is irrelevant to playing the game.

    The topic is about the lack of input based matchmaking based on the system brand you have. Stick to the topic.

  • @cotu42 said in Current State of PC Match-Making:

    @blam320

    The rivalry between the players on PC and xbox is artificial. The gamers are gamers, they are people that play games... The difference between the two is the hardware that they bought and the brand it has attached to it. The specs of the system shouldn't be relevant, PCs have all different performances.

    PC is not inherently superior, it is an open system that can be superior based on the price tag you pay. Go look up the spec requirements of the game. Go buy a budget laptop and tell me that is better than the next generation xbox or a xbox one with an external SSD. In the world you get what you pay for, the variety in the PC world is huge... also the additional benefits of a PC over a dedicated gaming machine a console is irrelevant to playing the game.

    The topic is about the lack of input based matchmaking based on the system brand you have. Stick to the topic.

    Like I said before, hardware isn't the only reason why PCs are superior. We can choose our input device at our discretion, online play isn't locked behind a second paygate, we have thousands upon thousands more games to choose from, and we have many extra utilities that Consoles don't have. Your "argument" that the only difference is hardware and branding is utter nonsense. It's like comparing a bicycle to a Boeing 747. Both get you from point A to point B, but one of them has a ton of extra utilities.

    Going back to input-based matchmaking, it's impossible. As I said, PC players can choose input devices at their discretion. Console players will still complain about PC players having hardware advantages, regardless of the input device used. Hence why the PC versus Console "debate" is relevant.

  • @blam320

    Because someone buys a Tesla or a Ford do we have different rules on the road? My desktop PC is a beast, yet the laptop my nephew plays on is nothing in comparison. You act like any PC is a high end device while that just isn't realistic.

    Your comparison is wrong, the machine might be superior, but the people playing it are not. The choice to buy a machine, the specs, the perks and restrictions is on the person. The fact that PC players can use word, browse the internet or have more games at their disposal have nothing to do with the game we all play.

    Xbox players can use a mouse and keyboard or a controller at their own discression, both inputs are supported. Yet the lesser machine by your own accord is given privileges that is denied to the better one? You think that makes sense, why shouldn't they both be given the same options?

    There is no true rivalry between the platforms, because they are just branded machines; they run on the same core Windows 10 framework that the Xbox OS is built on, they still just have a hard drive, graphics unit, RAM and CPU. The elitist mentality is not justified, just because you buy a better machine or a branded machine does not make you a better human, gamer or anything. You just choose to buy something else... you act like owning a Xbox or PC is not something you choose. Are you going to come out now and demand that people on laptops get different options in the game, because it isn't a desktop? A computer is a computer, the fact that it is pre-built and runs a different operating system is quite irrelevant. Most people buy pre-built machines and never tinker with it in their life-time. The specs they buy are the specs they get.

    Just because people whine doesn't mean that they are justified to be treated differently and be given more rights. Xbox users have differences between them, external extensions, newer models and will be expanded in the future next winter with a machine that is a multitude better than any of the three current ones. People like you act like xbox players are all equals on a hardware level, but they are not. People act like all PC players are on a high end device while they are not. The truth is simple, spend more money on your hardware and you will have a better machine. That is just how the world works.

    If someone on a PC uses a controller or a person on a Xbox uses a Mouse and Keyboard, why are they forced into the shared world? If your argument is: Xbox should be separated from PC based on hardware restrictions, why are those players on a Xbox with a mouse and keyboard not included? The Hypocrisy of the whole Xbox tag on the opt-out option is so blatant it is sad that we have people defend it. What makes a controller user on a Xbox so much more special than a mouse and keyboard user on a Xbox? Don't they both have the same hardware... What is the more important difference; that of the hardware or that of the input model?

    @Thornbush42 and this is exactly what I meant...

  • @kaijoi

    The unplugging of a controller could be detected, the disabling of input controls of a keyboard can be done, the technology is there and Rare can implement it. It might take a little while, but it isn't all that much different than what they do on a Xbox.

    It is also no new concept or that it has never been done before, Call of Duty is one of the games where they actually have controller only support for PC. Funnily enough a shooter is doing what Rare stated their design mantra was... while Rare threw the towel in the ring.

    @Blam320 @Thornbush42
    To remind people of the principle that Rare had which they abandoned with the Xbox exclusive feature; input based matchmaking:
    No Compromise Cross Play - No * Cross-play turned into: "*Xbox only"

  • @cotu42 said in Current State of PC Match-Making:

    @blam320

    Because someone buys a Tesla or a Ford do we have different rules on the road? My desktop PC is a beast, yet the laptop my nephew plays on is nothing in comparison. You act like any PC is a high end device while that just isn't realistic.

    Your comparison is wrong, the machine might be superior, but the people playing it are not. The choice to buy a machine, the specs, the perks and restrictions is on the person. The fact that PC players can use word, browse the internet or have more games at their disposal have nothing to do with the game we all play.

    Xbox players can use a mouse and keyboard or a controller at their own discression, both inputs are supported. Yet the lesser machine by your own accord is given privileges that is denied to the better one? You think that makes sense, why shouldn't they both be given the same options?

    There is no true rivalry between the platforms, because they are just branded machines; they run on the same core Windows 10 framework that the Xbox OS is built on, they still just have a hard drive, graphics unit, RAM and CPU. The elitist mentality is not justified, just because you buy a better machine or a branded machine does not make you a better human, gamer or anything. You just choose to buy something else... you act like owning a Xbox or PC is not something you choose. Are you going to come out now and demand that people on laptops get different options in the game, because it isn't a desktop? A computer is a computer, the fact that it is pre-built and runs a different operating system is quite irrelevant. Most people buy pre-built machines and never tinker with it in their life-time. The specs they buy are the specs they get.

    Just because people whine doesn't mean that they are justified to be treated differently and be given more rights. Xbox users have differences between them, external extensions, newer models and will be expanded in the future next winter with a machine that is a multitude better than any of the three current ones. People like you act like xbox players are all equals on a hardware level, but they are not. People act like all PC players are on a high end device while they are not. The truth is simple, spend more money on your hardware and you will have a better machine. That is just how the world works.

    If someone on a PC uses a controller or a person on a Xbox uses a Mouse and Keyboard, why are they forced into the shared world? If your argument is: Xbox should be separated from PC based on hardware restrictions, why are those players on a Xbox with a mouse and keyboard not included? The Hypocrisy of the whole Xbox tag on the opt-out option is so blatant it is sad that we have people defend it. What makes a controller user on a Xbox so much more special than a mouse and keyboard user on a Xbox? Don't they both have the same hardware... What is the more important difference; that of the hardware or that of the input model?

    @Thornbush42 and this is exactly what I meant...

    You keep putting words into my mouth and I don't appreciate it. Either we're going to have a debate or we're not.

  • @thornbush42 They should instead implement input based matchmaking whilst maintaining crossplay.

    Jason Ronald even said SOT was getting FPS enhancements for series x.

    The opt out usage percentage is around 7.5% of the player base.

    In all honesty though I've played on those xbox servers, and its shocking how easy it is when it comes to the PvP aspect.

    Although if you really want to, you can still use a K+M in these servers if you know how.

  • @blam320 are you referring to the topic of the thread or are you trying to derail the conversation? Are you interested in a discussion or just want to disrupt the conversation.

    The topic is how input matchmaking is limited to those on a xbox console owners and should be offered to those on PC.

    You are the one arguing that it is justified because PCs can be significantly better if people are willing to pay the price. While ignoring that xbox owners can improve their system with external hard drives, newer models and soon a new generation xbox which will have many of the perks that PC players already have or that PC owners can have lesser machines based on their specs that they bought. The price you pay makes the hardware you use better, this is not exclusive to PC, while PC has a bigger range, it also applies to xbox users.

    You want to make a conversation about input based matchmaking to a PC vs Xbox conversation, while the specs of the system one buys is irrelevant to the input based discrepancies. Both options of input is offered to each platform, so why is a input matchmaking system limited to one?

    The whole idea that the hardware used to play the game on should provide benefits to those that buy the right brand is correct and is a practice we should support? You believe that is justified?

    Why is the line of hardware variety and differences drawn with a brand? A xbox with an external SSD drive has significant advantages in terms of load times, just as PCs with a SSD have those advantages. This is not an opinion but a fact.

    The variety of how we access the internet is irrelevant to the topic, the variety of games we can play is irrelevant to the topic and the variety of activities one can perform on the platform is irrelevant to the topic. If you truly want to have a discussion about the topic, feel free to respond. If your goal is to derail the topic, stop.

35
Posts
27.7k
Views
10 out of 35