pets should be able to carry items now since skeletons can.

  • some people might cry pay to win..... but now that you are selling literal pay2win with enhanced spatial audio so people can hear other players foot steps better...... why not?

  • 8
    Posts
    2.1k
    Views
  • "You're making the game worse in one way, so why not make it worse in other ways too?" Insane take.
    "People will cry pay to win but..." The spatial audio sucks, and you can still access it for free. There are other programs that can do the same thing as the one they are partnering with. As well, yes, it's literally pay to win. You have to pay for pets with real money. SoT doesn't even let you use in game currency or mechanics to have any type of advantage. The design philosophy for SoT is that all players are given the same tools and the only differentiator is skill. What you do with the tools is your deal.

  • Not that it’s an issue of it being “pay to win”, I just think it’s a poor idea forcing us to have pets out when they’re purely cosmetic. Let us throw them a ball or a toy for them for fun, not exploit them as a treasure carrier.

  • You pay to own pets. You find or dig up skeletons (free)

    Difference.

  • Some people might point out the obvious flaw in my suggestion, but the existence of other questionable decisions make the conversation redundant.

    Okay....

  • Rare brought back some of the banned players, so why not just remove EAC altogether so all of us can use hacks with no problems? People cry about them anyways.

    Top notch logic. 😂

  • If Rare gives everyone 1 basic/standard pet that can carry items, then sure.

    People would still buy pets for different species/colors/etc.

  • @raft2c7c

    Sounds true. But players will then demand there favorite pet be able to do these things. Not some pet they got for free. All is equal :p

8
Posts
2.1k
Views
2 out of 8