@wolfmanbush said in PvPers Found A New Exploit. Because Of Course They Did.:
@eguzky said in PvPers Found A New Exploit. Because Of Course They Did.:
@wolfmanbush said in PvPers Found A New Exploit. Because Of Course They Did.:
@eguzky said in PvPers Found A New Exploit. Because Of Course They Did.:
- They were camping. That's reportable. They were not taking our treasure or sinking our ship. Why are you making excuses for toxic players?
- Using fire in specific areas to alter player spawns for easier camping is an exploit.
Or are you going to say they just somehow managed to set the same two fires both times they got aboard, when one was in the hold & one was at the map table; Neither easy to accidentally/randomly hit. And neither being a place where we fought them.
Nothing you have said yet shows that they were being toxic. You are assuming the worst and intentions, I don't do that. You can use your report tool however you wish, I don't accuse people of things to go with the flow.
I think accusation culture in gaming with sus and toxicity significantly harms the environment. That's why I challenge inconclusive accusations like this.
They were camping.
They did not try to sink us. You assume they were trying to sink us because that's what you want to assume to make me wrong.
- They did not try to take our treasure when we were dead.
- They were waiting on our ship to kill us every time we spawned.
- They never used cannonballs when firing at us
- We always spawned in front of them because of the fires. Making that an exploit.
So tell me again how nothing I said shows they were being toxic. Because everything I said shows they were being toxic. You just refused to admit that so you can, for whatever reason, defend them.
Taking treasure is not an obligation.
They were sinking you and you still haven't said they repairing or bucketing.
Cannonballs being relevant would need more context
They threw firebombs, people throw firebombs every day. Doesn't mean anything.
Taking treasure is not an obligation.
No, but if they were not in it for treasure, that leaves sinking us or ruining our fun via camping
They were sinking you and you still haven't said they repairing or bucketing.
You may have missed the part where they were not trying to sink us when shooting at us because:
Cannonballs being relevant would need more context
Context: They did not want to sink us, so they did not fire cannonballs at us. If they did not want our treasure & did not want to sink us; That leaves camping to make us unhappy.
They threw firebombs, people throw firebombs every day. Doesn't mean anything.
They threw firebombs in two specific spots. More than once.
Those spots made us easier to camp.
Stop being an apologist for toxic exploiters.
I've given enough context and all you say is 'But ackshually no' because you want me to be wrong, for some vague reason.