@pithyrumble YES! But I don’t think that Rare will add a separate tab under the second glove, so I suggested that the rings could hide the glove when the rings are put on

@pithyrumble yea not a fan sure he could pull it off but a drunken pirate just looks drunken

@otherfanboy

Whaaaat, no Pirate Michael Jackson?

@pithyrumble ahh I thought they where both hands at once ...and yea the fingerless gloves showing ring would have been nice still would look weird to have one glove on a hand and rings on the other but that's just me

@otherfanboy said in Add the ability for the rings to be on top of the glove:

@odin299 yes but the rings show up on both hands not just one hand

No. The rings come right and left hand so you can wear them on either or both. He's suggesting gloves get the same treatment, so you wouldn't need to re-design all the gloves, just the interface for them.

Would be nice if they showed up w/fingerless gloves tho.

@odin299 yes but the rings show up on both hands not just one hand

@otherfanboy I suggested that the rings remove the glove from the hand on which these rings are worn

@odin299 right that's a one or the other not both it just removing the eye patch for the mask

@otherfanboy Well, the rings can work as a Briggsy mask. If the pirate is wearing an eyepatch and when he uses Briggsy's mask, the eyepatch disappears

@odin299 I like the idea but it's not simple which is why we didn't get it to begin with my guess it for the same reason we don't see our weapons being carried on our pirates which be because the end up clipping through stuff weird and it's a ton of work that not everyone is going to use

@otherfanboy I didn't understand what you mean. Did you not like it?

@odin299 go count how many gloves there are in the game then go make variations for all the ring variations with glove variations not as simple as it may sound yes it would be awesome but I wouldn't hold your breath